WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:11.270
Gentle lady yields back. We just strike the last word. Gentleman from Kentucky is recognized. >> You know, a lot of the fights or the debates up here are left versus right.

00:00:11.280 --> 00:00:19.429
And there are a few of them that aren't left versus right. This is one of those. This is the big guys versus the little guys. said, "We don't have enough people

00:00:19.439 --> 00:00:27.509
up here speaking for the little guys," which could include patent holders who've taken a beating legislatively in

00:00:27.519 --> 00:00:38.790
the courts over the last decade or two decades and are struggling. This is just another effort to keep them from getting their day in court. Uh this, you know,

00:00:38.800 --> 00:00:47.990
there's a boogeyman here, which is China or other foreign adversaries. If that were really what this bill went was going to go after, we could narrowly

00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:56.709
tailor a bill that did that. And in fact, I'll offer an amendment to make this bill into that. But that is not what this bill is. This bill is so

00:00:56.719 --> 00:01:05.750
overly broad that it will basically deter investments in legitimate claims that that startups and small plaintiffs

00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:15.190
have. Um, the bill's language is so expansive that it may require disclosure of entire chains of financial interests, including venture capitalists, limited

00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:23.830
partners, pension funds, or even shareholders of public companies. It compels submission of funding agreements to opposing parties without protections

00:01:23.840 --> 00:01:33.190
for proprietary information like funding amounts, waterfall structures, or investment terms. Information that has no relevance to the legal merits of the

00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:42.390
case. But it could help the defendants, the big guys, know how deep your pockets are and how long they're going to have to go to starve you out in the

00:01:42.400 --> 00:01:51.270
litigation. Even the requirement for inc camera review is problematic. Defendants are not required to disclose indemnification agreements. Yet

00:01:51.280 --> 00:02:01.030
plaintiffs must expose sensitive financial backing that could be weaponized through retaliation, harassment, or reputational damage.

00:02:01.040 --> 00:02:10.229
Registered investment adviserss already subject to full FEC oversight would be swept into disclosure mandates duplicating regulations without any

00:02:10.239 --> 00:02:18.869
national security justification. And by admitting that these disclosures are inadmissible and not discoverable, the bill conceds that they serve no

00:02:18.879 --> 00:02:28.710
evidentiary purpose and are instead designed to chill litigation finance, ultimately benefiting large corporate defendants. You don't have to take my

00:02:28.720 --> 00:02:37.030
word for it. Listen to the groups on the outside, some conservative, some liberal, but all trying to rep represent

00:02:37.040 --> 00:02:45.830
everyday Americans who deserve their day in court. And if this bill passes, it will squatchch their voice by cutting

00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:53.990
off their funding, by intimidating their financeers. Um, and that's what the big guys would love. So, I'm going to be opposed to

00:02:54.000 --> 00:03:03.030
this bill and I will offer um amendments and hopefully they will be accepted because they're offered in good faith to

00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:12.309
do what we're being told the bill does, which is to keep foreign adversaries from infiltrating our our courts and changing the balance of justice in the

00:03:12.319 --> 00:03:21.589
United States. And with that, I yield back. Gentleman yields back. I believe the gentleman from Kentucky has an amendment. >> Have an amendment at the desk. Clerk

00:03:21.599 --> 00:03:30.149
will report >> amendment to the amendment point of order. >> Point of order reserved by the ranking member from Maryland. Without objection, the me be considered as read. The

00:03:30.159 --> 00:03:39.190
gentleman from Kentucky is recognized to explain his amendment. This this is a very simple amendment. Um, it's been proposed today by the proponents of the

00:03:39.200 --> 00:03:50.390
bill that this is about keeping foreign influence out of our courts and our foreign adversaries, keeping them out of our uh, IP and generally protecting

00:03:50.400 --> 00:03:59.750
America from foreign influence. So, my amendment offered in good faith would limit this bill to exactly that. It

00:03:59.760 --> 00:04:09.270
says, and it makes an exception for the financial disclosure for anybody who's a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States or any entity

00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:19.189
organized and principally operated under the laws of the United States or any state thereof and not controlled directly or indirectly by a foreign person. That's all that's all the

00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:29.590
amendment does. It's very simple. It basically says that this bill is about foreign adversaries and we're not going to make it broadly applicable to other

00:04:29.600 --> 00:04:36.240
things. And u I yield back.